Priestley’s Paradox

It is assumed that technology has aided the accession in social communication however it important to discuss the effects of technology on upstart font communication. This essay briefly provides a critical opinion on modern communication and provides examples of some interpersonal communication that rely on new technology, its potential advantage and possible dilemma with the use of modern technology in interpersonal communication.The world today is a global world we live in a global village and the world as we know it keeps decreasing due to the rapid branch of technology. The ever increasing speed at the development of new technology creates innovative ways of communication and in more ways than one has changed the way battalion communicate. Although modern communication has some advantages, which entangle convenience, speed, dissemination, and these advantages can be overpowered by disadvantages such(prenominal) as lack of content, language confusion.It will be argued her e(predicate) that the role of modern technology provides methods that hinder interpersonal communication, therefore spot there are trustworthy advantages associated with the increase of communications technology these are evidently outweighed by the disadvantages. Communication is important to humans and a vital part of our world man is a social animal and therefore requires communication as an essential tool for socializing. Focusing on interpersonal communication skills, Eunson (2008, p. 86) defines this as the processes that help, distort or gourmandize communication of messages between individuals but communicating effectively requires some basic skills such as alert listening, usage and interpretation of body language and facial expressions. Technology however has created different channels to resurrect interpersonal communication, invention such as mobile phones, emails, social networks, has made for easier, faster and smarter ways of communicating.This has take to the i nternet becoming an essential instrument in the media and communication strategies of civil society (Bailey, Cammaers, Carpentier 2008, p. 98). However with such availability, communication barriers are constantly increasing, with language confusion and a vast vocabulary of ever ontogeny internet slang. Priestleys paradox suggests that the rapid increase in communications technology has increased the standard but decreased the quality of contemporary communication (Eunson 2008, p. 4-5).Whether or not this statement is entirely true, it is unavoidable that it is very representative of the degree to which communication has deteriorated due to the constant increase of different technologically deepen means of communication. Communication between individuals includes both verbal and non-verbal that can be easily misunderstood depending on the medium of communication. The occurrence of misunderstanding between individuals is heightened because of the lack of personal connection and c ontext.Emails are generally informal, uncrystallised with the use of colloquialisms and jargons, email has rendered irrelevant more direct and often more effective forms of communication such as using telephone, walking down the corridor and talking, or attending meetings (Eunson 2008, p. 208-215). In addition to that, some people take advantage of the accessibility of move an email and say things they wouldnt feel comfortable precept in hardiness to face conversations and messages sent can be misinterpreted or misunderstood by liquidator further reducing the quality of communication.Things such as body language and eye contact is non-existent when it comes to sending emails, these are very essential part of daily conversations and some people use it as an let off to avoid face to face conversation. Many may argue that in the past few historic period the world has undergone radical changes with the amount of available modern communication mediums, and these appears to have ca used an increase in the upshot of social networks.Online communications mediums, weblogs in part, are sites of author audience interaction that differ from face to face performance and traditional reader relationship (Buckingham 2000, p. 207). Most young people spend countless hours on social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter and Yahoo creating friendships and relationships with people they meet in cyberspace. The strangeway in which so many of these interactants see the internet as both an intimate area for exchange, as well as a place for public display, challenges our perceptions of these boundaries (Buckingham & willet 2006, p. 19). The ease at which many disclose personal breeding on the internet via social networking sites is alarming as they generally are exposed to risks of contact with paedophiles (e. g. via stuffing in chat rooms) and often exposure to violent or racist / hate material (Buckingham & Willet 2006, p. 94). Another advantage of communicating via so cial network sites is that people can share ideas and values while maintaining anonymity. Concerns about modern communication is the